[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9 |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:08:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/04/2011 03:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Found one, and it even works on libvirt (where the gnulib submodule is
> named .gnulib instead of gnulib). It should also work on a repository
> with multiple submodules, although I have not yet tested it on bison.git.
>
> gnulib-commit-check:
> git submodule foreach test '$$(git merge-base --independent \
> origin $$sha1 | wc -w)' = 1
>
> This effectively runs the shell command:
>
> git merge-base --independent origin $sha1
>
> with $sha1 set to the value recorded in the superproject (identical to
> your computation of $commit), and outputs the minimal set of revisions
> not reachable from any other in the set of arguments. If origin
> contains $sha1, the output is a single hash (it happens to be that of
> origin); if $sha1 is a local-only revision, the output is two hashes, so
> the test fails, which in turn lets 'make alpha' fail.
Not quite robust enough - if your superproject contains commits not
pushed upstream yet, then merge-base would still output a single
reference. This should close that gap, by requiring that the least
reachable commit be exactly the upstream origin.
gnulib-commit-check:
git submodule foreach test '$$(git rev-parse origin)' \
= '"$$(git merge-base --independent origin $$sha1)"'
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [coreutils] new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/04
- [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/04
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Eric Blake, 2011/01/04
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Eric Blake, 2011/01/04
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/05
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/06
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Eric Blake, 2011/01/06
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Jim Meyering, 2011/01/06
- Re: [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Eric Blake, 2011/01/06
- [coreutils] Re: new branch in gnulib: coreutils-8.9, Andreas Schwab, 2011/01/04