[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [coreutils] considering uncrustify for automatic indentation: prepar
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: [coreutils] considering uncrustify for automatic indentation: prepare |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
On 31/05/10 10:12, Jim Meyering wrote:
> [PATCH 1/4] stat: use gnulib's alignof module
> [PATCH 2/4] maint: correct indentation of case_GETOPT_* macro uses
> [PATCH 3/4] maint: replace each "for (;;)" with "while (true)"
> [PATCH 4/4] maint: make spacing around "=" consistent, even in IF_LINT
>
> I've been considering using uncrustify to automatically
> format coreutils
How does it compare to GNU indent?
I was surprised there was no comparison on the site.
For reference GNU indent sometimes works for coreutils
with these settings.
-Toff_t
-Twchar_t
-Tsize_t
-TFILE
-Tuintmax_t
-Tintmax_t
-nut
-l80
cheers,
Pádraig.
- [coreutils] considering uncrustify for automatic indentation: prepare, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/31
- [coreutils] [PATCH 1/4] stat: use gnulib's alignof module, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/31
- [coreutils] [PATCH 2/4] maint: correct indentation of case_GETOPT_* macro uses, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/31
- [coreutils] [PATCH 4/4] maint: make spacing around "=" consistent, even in IF_LINT, Jim Meyering, 2010/05/31
- [coreutils] [PATCH 3/4] maint: replace each "for (; ; )" with "while (true)", Jim Meyering, 2010/05/31
- Re: [coreutils] considering uncrustify for automatic indentation: prepare,
Pádraig Brady <=