[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU/consensus] Liquid democracy vs blockchain anarchy
From: |
lilo |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU/consensus] Liquid democracy vs blockchain anarchy |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2018 11:44:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
Il 20/09/2016 12:07, hellekin ha scritto:
> On 09/06/2016 04:12 PM, carlo von lynX wrote:
>
>> Liquid feedback is a democratic platform that scales and works,
>> so that is major important news. It's not a hype.
>
>
> Can you produce documents that demonstrate users of liquid feedback
> spend less time, are more active citizens, and less stressed with this
> usage? That would at least convince me to give it a try. But I have
> the intuition that LF requires more time and more attention, that
> belongs to the chair-keyboard arrangement, while I'm more interested in
> practical activity with real people in concrete environments.
:*
--lilo;
0x703374720A0E6F2A.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [GNU/consensus] Liquid democracy vs blockchain anarchy,
lilo <=