Re: [GNU/consensus] Liquid democracy vs blockchain anarchy

[hellekin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/06/2016 04:12 PM, carlo von lynX wrote:
>
> Liquid feedback is a democratic platform that scales and works,
> so that is major important news. It's not a hype.
>

Can you produce documents that demonstrate users of liquid feedback
spend less time, are more active citizens, and less stressed with this
usage?  That would at least convince me to give it a try.  But I have
the intuition that LF requires more time and more attention, that
belongs to the chair-keyboard arrangement, while I'm more interested in
practical activity with real people in concrete environments.

For example, are there municipalities that adopted LF in their daily
workflow with citizens?  Are there tangible results of such adoption?
If such adoption didn't happen yet, why?  Etc.

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Qr5b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----