Re: Proposed patch: add aarch64le to config.sub

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 07:49:44AM -0500, Elad Lahav wrote:
> QNX reports the architecture as aarch64le (on little-endian machines),
> which matches neither aarch64 nor aarch64_be.
> I don't know how standardized these architecture names are supposed to
> be. This may be a trivial change to add or a contentious topic.
> Hopefully the former.

Wouldn't it be more appropriate to treat aarch64le as an alias to aarch64
like in the following patch:

diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub
index 38f3d03..e0e1799 100755
--- a/config.sub
+++ b/config.sub
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in
        xscale-* | xscalee[bl]-*)
                cpu=`echo "$cpu" | sed 's/^xscale/arm/'`
                ;;
-       arm64-*)
+       arm64-* | aarch64le-*)
                cpu=aarch64
                ;;
 
diff --git a/testsuite/config-sub.data b/testsuite/config-sub.data
index d911c5b..44bd2f1 100644
--- a/testsuite/config-sub.data
+++ b/testsuite/config-sub.data
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ aarch64_be-elf                                        
aarch64_be-unknown-elf
 aarch64_be-linux                               aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu
 aarch64_be-unknown-elf                         aarch64_be-unknown-elf
 aarch64_be-unknown-linux                       aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu
+aarch64le-qnx                                  aarch64-unknown-qnx
 abacus                                         abacus-unknown-none
 adobe68k                                       m68010-adobe-scout
 alliant                                                fx80-alliant-none


-- 
ldv