Re: [PATCH] config.sub: go back to backtick substitutions

[Jacob Bachmeyer]

Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 7/3/21, Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>   
> > > shellcheck barfs with SC1117 in config.guess, but no errors with
> > > config.sub.
> > >       
> > I get no errors with either of them when pasting them at shellcheck.net
> > as of commit 45e181800a6a27268a9c5d79dcc60492fef9a9a0.  Looking up
> > SC1117 shows that you are using a very old shellcheck --
> >     
>
> Yes it was an old version.
>
> Is the patchset OK ?

I have no suggestions for further improvement; we will need to wait for 
Dmitry V. Levin (who maintains these scripts) to look at them and make 
an official decision.  Recent history suggests that he will need 
anywhere from a few days to a few weeks.  Acceptances seem to take 
longer than rejections.


-- Jacob