Re: thumbv7[arm] support

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:03:54PM -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> We received this report on automake from Kolanich (thanks):
> (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43945):
> 
>     Hello. When I crosscompiled some app I had to patch some file
>     generated by autoreconf -i, where I have to add thumbv7[arm] (using
>     the analogy to armv7[arm] already present there) there. 
> 
> He later followed up with the necessary change, which
> turned out to be for config.sub:
> 
> --- a/config.sub
> +++ b/config.sub
> ..
> -     | arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2-8] | armv[3-8][lb] | armv7[arm] \
> +     | arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2-8] | armv[3-8][lb] | armv7[arm] | 
> thumbv7[arm] \
> 
> Dmitry, or anyone, wdyt? I know little about the myriad arm
> architectures. --thanks, karl.

thumbv7[arm] means thumbv7a | thumbv7r | thumbv7m - did you mean that?
Just to make sure you didn't mean that thumbv7* needs to be translated
to arm or armv7*.

What's the CPU-MFR-OPSYS triplet you are using?


-- 
ldv