[commit-womb] gnumaint Makefile gnupackages.txt massmail-1201...

[karl]

CVSROOT:        /sources/womb
Module name:    gnumaint
Changes by:     karl <karl>     13/05/23 23:55:42

Modified files:
        .              : Makefile gnupackages.txt 
Added files:
        .              : massmail-1201-copyright.txt 
                         massmail-1303-cveauto.txt 
                         massmail-1305-stale.txt 
Removed files:
        .              : template-copyright.txt template-cveauto.txt 

Log message:
        rename template-* to massmail-*, template for next mailing

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/Makefile?cvsroot=womb&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/gnupackages.txt?cvsroot=womb&r1=1.168&r2=1.169
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/massmail-1201-copyright.txt?cvsroot=womb&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/massmail-1303-cveauto.txt?cvsroot=womb&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/massmail-1305-stale.txt?cvsroot=womb&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/template-copyright.txt?cvsroot=womb&r1=1.1&r2=0
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnumaint/template-cveauto.txt?cvsroot=womb&r1=1.1&r2=0

Patches:
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/womb/gnumaint/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- Makefile    10 Mar 2013 21:39:09 -0000      1.47
+++ Makefile    23 May 2013 23:55:41 -0000      1.48
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $Id: Makefile,v 1.47 2013/03/10 21:39:09 karl Exp $
+# $Id: Makefile,v 1.48 2013/05/23 23:55:41 karl Exp $
 # Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 # Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 #
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
        gm generate maintainers bypackage
 
 test-genemail email:
-       gm generate email bypackage -o msg.1303 -p pkglist-cveauto.txt -t 
template-cveauto.txt
+       gm generate email bypackage -o msg.1303 -p pkglist-cveauto.txt -t 
massmail-1303-cveauto.txt
        ls msg.1303/
 
 email-1201:
-       gm generate email bypackage -o msg.1201 -p pkglist-fsfpackages.txt -t 
template-copyright.txt
+       gm generate email bypackage -o msg.1201 -p pkglist-fsfpackages.txt -t 
massmail-1201-copyright.txt
        ls msg.1201/
 test-genemail-err:
        gm generate email bypackage  # should give error, missing args

Index: gnupackages.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/womb/gnumaint/gnupackages.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.168
retrieving revision 1.169
diff -u -b -r1.168 -r1.169
--- gnupackages.txt     14 May 2013 18:29:39 -0000      1.168
+++ gnupackages.txt     23 May 2013 23:55:41 -0000      1.169
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $Id: gnupackages.txt,v 1.168 2013/05/14 18:29:39 karl Exp $
+# $Id: gnupackages.txt,v 1.169 2013/05/23 23:55:41 karl Exp $
 # Public domain.
 # 
 # This file is maintained in the CVS repository of GNU womb,
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
 doc-summary: Automated program generator
 doc-url: /software/autogen/manual/
 gplv3-status: done-in-5.9.5
-activity-status: ok 20130331 (5.17.3)
+activity-status: ok 20130518 (5.17.4)
 
 package: automake
 copyright-holder: fsf-no-reply
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
 doc-summary: Making GNU standards-compliant Makefiles
 doc-url: /software/automake/manual/
 gplv3-status: done-with-exception-#349136
-activity-status: ok 20130101 (1.13.1)
+activity-status: ok 20130515 (1.13.2)
 
 package: avl
 copyright-holder: fsf-ok-#786498
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@
 logo: /software/freeipmi/images/freeipmi-logo-small.jpg
 gplv3-status: in-dev-sources
 last-contact: 14jan10 replied, next major release
-activity-status: ok 20130429 (1.2.6)
+activity-status: ok 20130516 (1.2.7)
 
 package: freetalk
 doc-category: Internet
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@
 doc-summary: OpenGL Extremely Easy-to-use Manipulators
 doc-url: /software/gleem/doc/
 gplv3-status: not-done-since-nomaint
-activity-status: nomaint/20121217 20020205 (1.2.1)
+activity-status: newmain/20130517 20020205 (1.2.1)
 
 package: glib
 mundane-name: GLib
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@
 doc-url: /software/gmp/manual/
 logo: http://gmplib.org/gmplogo2.png
 gplv3-status: done?-per-andreas-enge
-activity-status: ok 20130211 (5.1.1)
+activity-status: ok 20130520 (5.1.2)
 
 package: gnash
 copyright-holder: fsf-ok-#786466
@@ -2476,7 +2476,7 @@
 doc-summary: Build and execute command lines in parallel
 doc-url: /software/parallel/man.html
 gplv3-status: done-in-20100424
-activity-status: ok 20130421 (20130422)
+activity-status: ok 20130522 (20130522)
 
 package: parted
 copyright-holder: fsf-no-reply
@@ -3307,7 +3307,7 @@
 doc-summary: Create, manipulate, burn ISO-9660 filesystems
 doc-url: /software/xorriso/man_1_xorriso.html
 gplv3-status: done
-activity-status: ok 20130319 (1.2.8)
+activity-status: ok 20130517 (1.3.0)
 note: Libburnia project = address@hidden
 note: xorriso support also on address@hidden
 

Index: massmail-1201-copyright.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: massmail-1201-copyright.txt
diff -N massmail-1201-copyright.txt
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ massmail-1201-copyright.txt 23 May 2013 23:55:41 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+From: address@hidden (GNU Project)
+To: %PACKAGE_MAINTAINERS
+Subject: %PACKAGE_NAME and non-FSF-copyrighted code
+Precedence: bulk
+
+Greetings,
+
+I'm sending you this message on behalf of the GNU Project because
+according to the FSF's records, you are the maintainer(s) of
+%PACKAGE_NAME, which is supposed to be an FSF-copyrighted package.
+
+We would like to gather information on any code or other material in
+your package that is *not* copyrighted by the FSF.  Could you please
+reply to this message (which should go to address@hidden) and let
+us know?  That is, one of:
+
+1) There is no non-FSF-copyrighted material in %PACKAGE_NAME.
+
+2) There is non-FSF-copyrighted code included in %PACKAGE_NAME,
+   per the procedure described in the External Libraries node
+   of the maintainers' guide:
+   http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/External-Libraries.html
+
+3) Something else.
+
+Please include any and all relevant details.
+
+(Aside from this, if you have any news or questions regarding the
+package, please let us know at address@hidden)
+
+Thanks for contributing to GNU, and happy hacking.
+
+Karl Berry
+Assistant Chief GNUisance

Index: massmail-1303-cveauto.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: massmail-1303-cveauto.txt
diff -N massmail-1303-cveauto.txt
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ massmail-1303-cveauto.txt   23 May 2013 23:55:42 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+From: address@hidden (GNU Project)
+To: %PACKAGE_MAINTAINERS
+Subject: %PACKAGE_NAME and Automake-related vulnerabilities
+Precedence: bulk
+
+Greetings,
+
+I'm sending you this message on behalf of GNU because as far as we know,
+you are the maintainer(s) of %PACKAGE_NAME.  (If you're not maintaining
+it, please reply to let me know.)
+
+Two vulnerabilities related to Automake-generated Makefiles and the dist
+and distcheck target were discovered some time ago.  It seemed to me
+that the latest release of %PACKAGE_NAME on ftp.gnu.org was still
+vulnerable to one or both.  They are:
+  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-4029
+  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-3386
+
+(If you did make a later release that fixes these issues, don't worry
+about this email, and sorry for the noise.  I could not determine
+the status with absolute certainty.)
+
+The issues were fixed in automake releases 1.12.2 and 1.11.6.  So the
+simplest way to mitigate them is to regenerate the Makefiles using an
+automake that is at least that new and re-release.  If you don't want to
+do that, you can also hack the Makefiles to fix the problem by hand:
+  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2012-12/msg00049.html
+
+Although these vulnerabilities do not have a high probability of being
+exploited, of course we want GNU software to be safe.  So it would be
+good to make a new release, even if it's just to fix these bugs.  Of
+course other fixes or features are all to the good.
+
+As usual, aside from this issue, if you have any news or questions
+regarding the package, please let me know at address@hidden
+Thanks for contributing to GNU, and happy hacking.
+
+Karl Berry
+Assistant Chief GNUisance

Index: massmail-1305-stale.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: massmail-1305-stale.txt
diff -N massmail-1305-stale.txt
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ massmail-1305-stale.txt     23 May 2013 23:55:42 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+From: address@hidden (GNU Project)
+To: %PACKAGE_MAINTAINERS
+Subject: release of GNU %PACKAGE_NAME
+Reply-to: address@hidden
+
+Greetings,
+
+We're sending you this message on behalf of the GNU Project because as
+far as we know, you are the maintainer(s) of %PACKAGE_NAME.  (If you're
+not maintaining it, please just reply to let us know.)
+
+As far as we've been able to discern, %PACKAGE_NAME has gone
+several years without a new release.  If you have in fact made a recent
+release, please let us know, and sorry for the noise.  We could not
+determine the status with absolute certainty.
+
+Otherwise ... it has always been a basic goal of GNU that its
+constituent packages be actively developed and have releases from time
+to time.  Without a release, we periodically ping the maintainer(s) to see
+how things are going.  So, could you please reply to this message with a
+response to the following questions?  Please include all and any
+relevant information, better too much than too little.
+
+1) Can you estimate, even roughly, when a new release will be made?
+
+2) Have you been able to make progress (fixing bugs, updating
+infrastructure, adding features, ...) since the last release, or since
+our last contact with you?
+
+3) Are there technical, legal, or other barriers to making a release?
+We'd like to help if we can.
+
+4) Other comments?
+
+In general, if you have any news or questions regarding the package,
+please let us know at address@hidden  Thanks for contributing to
+GNU, and happy hacking.
+
+Brandon & Karl (GNUisances)

Index: template-copyright.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: template-copyright.txt
diff -N template-copyright.txt
--- template-copyright.txt      3 Dec 2012 19:06:17 -0000       1.1
+++ /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-From: address@hidden (GNU Project)
-To: %PACKAGE_MAINTAINERS
-Subject: %PACKAGE_NAME and non-FSF-copyrighted code
-Precedence: bulk
-
-Greetings,
-
-I'm sending you this message on behalf of the GNU Project because
-according to the FSF's records, you are the maintainer(s) of
-%PACKAGE_NAME, which is supposed to be an FSF-copyrighted package.
-
-We would like to gather information on any code or other material in
-your package that is *not* copyrighted by the FSF.  Could you please
-reply to this message (which should go to address@hidden) and let
-us know?  That is, one of:
-
-1) There is no non-FSF-copyrighted material in %PACKAGE_NAME.
-
-2) There is non-FSF-copyrighted code included in %PACKAGE_NAME,
-   per the procedure described in the External Libraries node
-   of the maintainers' guide:
-   http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/External-Libraries.html
-
-3) Something else.
-
-Please include any and all relevant details.
-
-(Aside from this, if you have any news or questions regarding the
-package, please let us know at address@hidden)
-
-Thanks for contributing to GNU, and happy hacking.
-
-Karl Berry
-Assistant Chief GNUisance

Index: template-cveauto.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: template-cveauto.txt
diff -N template-cveauto.txt
--- template-cveauto.txt        10 Mar 2013 21:39:09 -0000      1.1
+++ /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-From: address@hidden (GNU Project)
-To: %PACKAGE_MAINTAINERS
-Subject: %PACKAGE_NAME and Automake-related vulnerabilities
-Precedence: bulk
-
-Greetings,
-
-I'm sending you this message on behalf of GNU because as far as we know,
-you are the maintainer(s) of %PACKAGE_NAME.  (If you're not maintaining
-it, please reply to let me know.)
-
-Two vulnerabilities related to Automake-generated Makefiles and the dist
-and distcheck target were discovered some time ago.  It seemed to me
-that the latest release of %PACKAGE_NAME on ftp.gnu.org was still
-vulnerable to one or both.  They are:
-  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-4029
-  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-3386
-
-(If you did make a later release that fixes these issues, don't worry
-about this email, and sorry for the noise.  I could not determine
-the status with absolute certainty.)
-
-The issues were fixed in automake releases 1.12.2 and 1.11.6.  So the
-simplest way to mitigate them is to regenerate the Makefiles using an
-automake that is at least that new and re-release.  If you don't want to
-do that, you can also hack the Makefiles to fix the problem by hand:
-  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2012-12/msg00049.html
-
-Although these vulnerabilities do not have a high probability of being
-exploited, of course we want GNU software to be safe.  So it would be
-good to make a new release, even if it's just to fix these bugs.  Of
-course other fixes or features are all to the good.
-
-As usual, aside from this issue, if you have any news or questions
-regarding the package, please let me know at address@hidden
-Thanks for contributing to GNU, and happy hacking.
-
-Karl Berry
-Assistant Chief GNUisance