[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[hurd,commited] hurd: Make sure signals get started
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
[hurd,commited] hurd: Make sure signals get started |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:24:38 +0100 |
Now that _hurd_libc_proc_init is idempotent, we can always call it,
independently of the __libc_multiple_libcs test which may not match
whether signals should be started or not.
---
sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c
b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c
index a3d2fdaba0..1827479f86 100644
--- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c
+++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386/init-first.c
@@ -58,14 +58,14 @@ posixland_init (int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
{
__libc_multiple_libcs = &_dl_starting_up && !_dl_starting_up;
+ /* Now we have relocations etc. we can start signals etc. */
+ _hurd_libc_proc_init (argv);
+
/* Make sure we don't initialize twice. */
if (!__libc_multiple_libcs)
{
/* Set the FPU control word to the proper default value. */
__setfpucw (__fpu_control);
-
- /* Now we have relocations etc. we can start signals etc. */
- _hurd_libc_proc_init (argv);
}
else
{
--
2.28.0
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [hurd,commited] hurd: Make sure signals get started,
Samuel Thibault <=