[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Assertion failure
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: Assertion failure |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:25:55 +0100 |
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 19:26 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Agreed. I am still hoping someone has a good analysis of the issue, or
> wants to upgrade our mprec to the newlib version. If not we should
> indeed disable the assert again before 0.20 is released.
Which is what I did. For now we just disabled the assert to get us the
behavior we had before. After 0.20 we should solve this correctly. I
have updated the bug report to mention the things discussed in the two
threads about this.
2006-01-12 Mark Wielaard <address@hidden>
* native/fdlibm/mprec.c (Balloc): Disable assert to workaround
PR classpath/23863.
This solves all mauve regressions we were seeing.
It would be appreciated if others could also rerun their tests with this
applied.
Committed,
Mark
diff -u -r1.6 mprec.c
--- native/fdlibm/mprec.c 6 Jan 2006 01:27:20 -0000 1.6
+++ native/fdlibm/mprec.c 12 Jan 2006 09:20:55 -0000
@@ -97,7 +97,9 @@
int i = 0;
int j = 1;
- assert ((1 << k) < MAX_BIGNUM_WDS);
+ /* FIXME - assert disabled because of PR classpath/23863
+ * assert ((1 << k) < MAX_BIGNUM_WDS);
+ */
while ((ptr->_allocation_map & j) && i < MAX_BIGNUMS)
i++, j <<= 1;
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Assertion failure, Andrew Haley, 2006/01/10