[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.security
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: java.security |
Date: |
19 Dec 2000 10:36:02 -0700 |
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Benvenuto <address@hidden> writes:
Mark> Please note, the default provider only has SHA, MD5, and
Mark> DSA. Writing an X.509 provider is too much work. I think Tom
Mark> Tromey or someone said that using Cryptix's implementation is
Mark> possible. Checking their website (www.cryptix.org), the license
Mark> appears to be BSD-like.
We've used Cryptix with libgcj before. The Cryptix is BSD-like but is
probably not compatible with the GPL or LGPL. But I think it probably
is compatible with the GPL+exception that libgcj uses.
Tom
- java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/18
- Re: java.security, Mark Benvenuto, 2000/12/19
- Re: java.security,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/19
- Re: java.security, Mark Wielaard, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Tom Tromey, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Bryce McKinlay, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Tom Tromey, 2000/12/20
- Re: java.security, Mark Benvenuto, 2000/12/21
Re: java.security, Brian Jones, 2000/12/19