Re: [Chicken-users] sxml and more

[Jörg F. Wittenberger]

I know this is slightly off-topic. Related so far only to SXML, XSLT and 
chicken, because it's written in Chicken and implements and uses some 
XSLT and SXML (and SRFI-110 a.k.a. sweet expressions - a python like 
form to write LISP) quite a lot. So maybe it's helpful source to copy 
from in it.

Otherwise I admit it's a shameless plug to brag about my latest 
creation. ;-)
And to John and others who are in "readable lisp" it might be a nice 
read too.
So here are the docs for a little demo of a payment system I am working on:
http://ball.askemos.org/?_v=wiki&_id=1728
and this is the source code (don't read it in the browser, you need 
white space preserving source code view):
http://ball.askemos.org/Afe81b38dd025b8282ef1b684d88b9d2b

Best
/Jörg

Am 28.07.2014 13:06, schrieb Nathaniel Rudavsky-Brody:
> Thanks Peter and Jim, that makes a lot of sense. Even if they never 
> get homogenized, I'm glad the sxml tools exist, and the Chicken 
> division definitely helps.
>
> I guess my question boils down to "what am I missing" – do the 
> low-level functions only serve for writing the top-level ones, or do 
> they have uses of their own, which I can't imagine because I'm coming 
> to XML-processing with an XSLT mindset.