[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg
|
From: |
Matt Gushee |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 19:46:08 -0600 |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym
<address@hidden> wrote:
> It's probably best to define your own equality predicate, I think!
Yes, I think you're right. Thanks!
- [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Matt Gushee, 2014/07/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2014/07/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg,
Matt Gushee <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Matt Gushee, 2014/07/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alex Shinn, 2014/07/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alex Shinn, 2014/07/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, John Cowan, 2014/07/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alex Shinn, 2014/07/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, John Cowan, 2014/07/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alex Shinn, 2014/07/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2014/07/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, Peter Bex, 2014/07/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using epsilon in test egg, John Cowan, 2014/07/30