[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:37:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 07:17:58PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> Daniel Leslie <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Go also enjoys a rather robust Channels system, which is sort of like
> > Scheme's ports, only it's type-safe by design.
>
> How are Scheme ports not type-safe? The main difference is that Scheme
> ports are limited to just a single type (i.e. characters) but that
> doesn't make them type-unsafe, no? :-)
Actually, it's two types: Characters and the eof-object's type. And in
Gambit, there are other ports as well, from which you can only read
objects (like their directory-ports).
Cheers,
Peter the smartass
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, mfv, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Hugo Arregui, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Jörg F. Wittenberger, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Daniel Leslie, 2013/11/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken,
Peter Bex <=
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, John Cowan, 2013/11/27
Re: [Chicken-users] go routines for chicken, Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/11/28