[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN |
Date: |
Thu, 30 May 2013 16:54:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Felix scripsit:
> Very good - thanks a lot! I'll give this a try. Should we simply replace
> the serialization or do you think it would make sense to let the user
> choose a serialization mechanism for suspensions?
Given the advantages of PBs, I'd just move to them for all applications of
serialization, and abandon the "native Chicken" serialization.
--
It was dreary and wearisome. Cold clammy winter still held sway in this
forsaken country. The only green was the scum of livid weed on the dark
greasy surfaces of the sullen waters. Dead grasses and rotting reeds loomed
up in the mists like ragged shadows of long-forgotten summers.
--"The Passage of the Marshes" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Andy Bennett, 2013/05/29