[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there a Common Lisp like Chicken that compiles to
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Is there a Common Lisp like Chicken that compiles to C? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:16:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
John Long scripsit:
> Thanks, I saw that and it looks good at first glance but it's GPL. Anything
> else worth looking at?
Not really. ECL and GCL are cousins (from the old Kyoto CL code base)
and are both GPL. CLiCC is GPL, unmaintained, and supports only a "large
subset" of CLtL1. ThinLisp is Apache, but it's also unmaintained and
supports only a subset.
The good news is that CMUCL and SBCL (which is a slowly diverging fork of
CMUCL), at least according to Weinreb's latest (now last, alas!) survey
at <http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html>, have MIPS backends
for their native compilers. How well maintained they are I don't know.
--
There is no real going back. Though I John Cowan
may come to the Shire, it will not seem address@hidden
the same; for I shall not be the same. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth,
and a long burden. Where shall I find rest? --Frodo