[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting... |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:43:59 +0100 (CET) |
From: Markus Klotzbuecher <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:54:57 +0100
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:15:15AM -0500, Felix wrote:
>>
>> This announces the availability of "SPOCK", a Scheme->JavaScript
>> compiler and runtime system. It can statically compile
>> really-nearly-mostly R5RS-Scheme to JS or can be used to dynamically
>> generate code from s-expressions (say, in a web-server or CGI
>> application). Tail-calls and first-class continuations are fully
>> supported.
>>
>> It is slow, buggy, barely tested and stresses JavaScript engines in
>> unexpected ways. It doesn't run on IE, of course (this will be
>> addressed, someday). Documentation is not complete yet.
>>
>> If your browser supports <canvas> tags, you can try:
>>
>> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/threads.html
>>
>> This application draws some graphics in call/cc-based coroutines,
>> the source to this is here:
>>
>> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/threads.scm
>>
>> The test-suite can be run at:
>>
>> http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/spock/test.html
>>
>> Note that running this this takes a while and might trigger a
>> browser warning. Just continue executing it until it either
>> errors out or runs to completion.
>>
>> Initial documentation can be found here:
>>
>> http://wiki.call-cc.org/egg/spock
>
> Very nice! Could this be used to interact with Qt QML and Quick?
I haven't used these, but if QML is ECMA-Script-compliant, I see
no reason why it shouldn't work. I would be very interested in
the results, in case you are going to try it out!
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting..., Felix, 2011/03/10
- [Chicken-users] Re: No... but it is... interesting..., Ivan Shmakov, 2011/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting..., John Cowan, 2011/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting..., Erik Falor, 2011/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting..., Mario Domenech Goulart, 2011/03/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting..., Markus Klotzbuecher, 2011/03/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] No... but it is... interesting...,
Felix <=