[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] define-record and define-record-type
From: |
Jeronimo Pellegrini |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] define-record and define-record-type |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:17:07 -0300 (BRT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.15 |
Hello,
I see that I can (use srfi-9), but define-record-type is already
available, even if I don't (use) the module. Can I always count on that?
I also see from
http://chicken.wiki.br/manual/Non-standard%20macros%20and%20special%20forms#record-structures
that besides SRFI-9 define-record-type there is also a define-record that
has a somewhat
different interface. Besides the different interface, is there any other
differences between
those? (Memory usage pattern, efficiency etc?)
Thanks,
J.
- [Chicken-users] define-record and define-record-type,
Jeronimo Pellegrini <=