|
From: | Elf |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] command-line-arguments |
Date: | Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:19:45 -0700 (PDT) |
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc, if you want the external representation of your code. :) -elf On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
2008/10/10 Peter Bex <address@hidden>:On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote:(display (command-line-arguments))That's (kind of) a limitation of how 'display' works. #;1> (display (list "foo" "bar")) (foo bar) Instead, you want: #;2> (printf "~S" (list "foo" "bar")) ("foo" "bar")Thanks everyone! Note to self: "Don't rely on `display` to tell you what your code does."
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |