[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] bug in big numbers or somewhere
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] bug in big numbers or somewhere |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:03:38 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, naruto canada <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> actually I find another way to trigger the bug, having nothing to do
> with bignum literals:
>
> other schemes:
> ;; (factorial n)
> ;; test memorized recursion
> (newline)
> (factorial 55)
> ;'done
> ;12696403353658275925965100847566516959580321051449436762275840000000000000
>
> chicken:
> #<unspecified>
> 1.26964033536583e+73
>
This is perfectly fine and standard-compliant behaviour.
cheers,
felix