[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:47:26 -0600 |
So I need to do this?
(thread-sleep!
(milliseconds->time (+ 500 (time->milliseconds (current-time)))))
On 4/7/08, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > #;3> (thread-sleep! (milliseconds->time 1000)) ; returns immediately
> The seconds/milliseconds argument must be absolute, not relative.
> As specified in srfi-18:
- [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Jim Ursetto, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, felix winkelmann, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Graham Fawcett, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Jim Ursetto, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Graham Fawcett, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Jim Ursetto, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Graham Fawcett, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Daishi Kato, 2008/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! using milliseconds->time is broken, Jim Ursetto, 2008/04/07