[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:24:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> I'd rather people not include the full list by hand now,
> since I'd like a compiler optimization such as
>
> (declare (not string-integrations))
Very well, but I doubt you will get one. Felix has already declared
against declarations.
> I could actually add a syntax
> module that does this so people could say
>
> (use no-string-integrations)
Please do; or better yet, make that a consequence of (use utf8).
--
They do not preach John Cowan
that their God will rouse them address@hidden
A little before the nuts work loose. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
They do not teach
that His Pity allows them --Rudyard Kipling,
to drop their job when they damn-well choose. "The Sons of Martha"
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/14
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Alex Shinn, 2008/03/16
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, felix winkelmann, 2008/03/17