[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
Peter Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:41:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi!
> BTW, I keep saying "to and from" because lots of Schemes have FFIs,
> but being easily embeddable is not so common. Next version:
In that case I think it is better to explicitly say that it is easy to
embed Chicken in C programs. I had to think for a moment what this "to
and from" really meant.
Groetjes,
Peter.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?,
Peter Busser <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Alex Shinn, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Alex Shinn, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Alex Shinn, 2007/12/26