Re: [Chicken-users] wxWidgets

[Elf]

ive not seen any ftlk apps, and the library from my readings is very limited.
i have seen many wx apps, and despite being horrible code (in many cases)
the ui still works more or less as expected.

-elf

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Harri Haataja wrote:

> On 09/07/07, Adhi Hargo <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Well then, either we focus on wxWidgets, or FLTK (!).
> > I don't mind the latter, IMHO its interface is quite
> > clean and simple, a total opposite to wxWidgets albeit
> > somewhat limiting usage. Never encounter a buggy FLTK
> > app either (lack of exposure?).
>
> I have. Mainly my own, when I tried it :-D
>
> But seriously, I've seen at least one box (or X installation) where
> FLTK, and only FLTK would have garbled fonts. It seemed that they were
> 2px high or something. FLTK is very appealing in some ways, though.
>
> wx I recall as something that tries hard to advertise as cross
> platform and native look and fails miserably in the latter. Kind of
> like all the Java toolkits. But that's old memory and I don't remember
> using any wx apps. I take that as a sign personally, but of course
> that means nothing for anyone else's judgement. QT is still a creeping
> horror.
>
> Enough opinionated handwaving, I hope :)