Re: [Chicken-users] passing a string to foreign-lambda*

[Martin DeMello]

On 7/8/07, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Martin DeMello scripsit:
>
> > No, I don't want to pass str into the foreign function, i want str to
> > *be* the foreign function. That is, I want to use a variable rather
> > than an explicit string, or a macro that generates and inserts a
> > string into the right place.
>
> Since foreign-lambda* is itself a macro, your only hope is to write
> a macro that generates a foreign-lambda* with everything in the right
> places.

Thanks, will fight with that.

martin