|
From: | Zbigniew |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] hash-table-walk + hash-table-delete! |
Date: | Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:05:30 -0600 |
Just be careful of future updates to Chicken's implementation. Alternatively, this behavior could be made to be guaranteed in Chicken. It sounds like a good idea to me, but I am not an expert. On 3/5/07, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
Zbigniew is right but you could conditionally expand: (cond-expand (chicken ... hash-table-walk delete ... ) (else ... safe delete ... ) )
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |