Re: Re : [Chicken-users] thread-sleep! for less than a second

[felix winkelmann]

On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
> mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
> It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
> Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
> a time object,
> introducing time->milliseconds and milliseconds->time would be sufficient.

I prefer the latter solution. Could you write a ticket at
http://trac.callcc.org for
this?


cheers,
felix