[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] stack traces
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] stack traces |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:36:56 +0100 |
On 11/21/06, Dan <address@hidden> wrote:
> But I simply don't grok psyntax well enough to
> integrate it's
Ah, sorry about bugging you then, this must have been
on the list before... At the same time, I think what
you wrote is more of a statement about the overly
complex psyntax implementation than about any
particular Scheme implementor :)
Well, psyntax is good, don't get me wrong. It's a feast
of Scheme programming and packs incredible power
in relatively few lines of code. But it does a complex job,
and thus it is complex code.
cheers,
felix
--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp