[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:56:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
I ran from-scratch CMake and autotools builds of the current Darcs head
on my Cygwin system with basic wall-clock timing (the "time" command
in bash). Take this with a grain of salt, YMMV, etc. etc.
cmake "cmake /opt/chicken/darcs": 1m23s
cmake "make": 9m10s
cmake "make install": 0m15s
cmake total: 10m48s
autotools "autogen.sh": 0m32s
autotools "./configure": 3m8s
autotools "make BOOTSTRAP_PATH=/usr/local/bin": 11m11s
autotools "make install": 0m49s
autotools total: 15m40s
So CMake is very much the winner, probably because ./configure is doing
unnecessary tests.
--
Mos Eisley spaceport. You will never John Cowan
see a more wretched hive of scum and address@hidden
villainy -- unless you watch the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Jerry Springer Show. --georgettesworld.com
- [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, Sven . Hartrumpf, 2006/09/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comparative build speed for CMake and autotools, John Cowan, 2006/09/06
- [Chicken-users] re: binaries are not byte identical, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] re: binaries are not byte identical, John Cowan, 2006/09/06
- [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, felix winkelmann, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, felix winkelmann, 2006/09/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] optimization flags, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/09/07