chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?


From: Peter Bex
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] adding a "standard" regexp engine?
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 16:07:57 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Michele Simionato wrote:
> > - PCRE
> > - Oniguruma (very powerful, but also very big)
> I vote for PCRE, which is the one used by Python, IIRC.

PCRE has my vote too.  I never heard of Oniguruma, what makes it so
much more powerful than PCRE?

The most common one is PCRE, which makes it less annoying for people
to install.  We should depend on as few out-of-the-ordinary third-party
libraries as possible.  If an application has even a few dependencies
that I don't currently have, I think twice before installing it.

Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth

Attachment: pgpP40f4hG4HS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]