Re: [Chicken-users] Debugging -- truncating the call-history report?

[Graham Fawcett]

On 5/26/06, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> On May 25, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> > First, let me ask the short question: when an uncaught exception
> > occurs, is there a way to prevent exception-handler code from
> > appearing in the call-history report?
> Don't think there is a direct way to do what you want.
>
> You can access the call stack w/ 'get-call-chain' & parse it
> yourself.  Good.
>
> SRFI-12 doesn't allow replacing the 'current-exception-handler'
> except in a dynamic context. And even if it did the repl substitutes
> its' own. Bad.
>
> So, I guess dig into the ##sys#error-handler, ##sys#current-exception-
> handler, ##sys#repl-*-hook stuff (look in library.scm & eval.scm).
>
> Not what you wanted to hear.

Well, no -- but at least I know where to look, if I want to pursue
this. You've lit a candle, so I won't curse the darkness. ;-)

Thanks.
Graham