[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] bogus Makefile.am dependencies?
From: |
Kon Lovett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] bogus Makefile.am dependencies? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 13:40:53 -0700 |
On May 10, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
I am reading Chicken's Makefile.am, trying to translate it to
CMake. Currently I'm working on .scm --> .c file generation for
the build. I see a lot of entries like:
ueval.c: eval.scm parameters.scm
$(CHICKEN) eval.scm $(CHICKEN_UFLAGS) -output-file ueval.c -
explicit-use
Why are files like parameters.scm being given as dependencies when
they are not actually used in the associated build commands?
Makefile.am is full of this. Even if the implicit %.c: %.scm build
rule would generate parameters.c, I don't see that that's being
used either. Are these bogus dependencies, or poorly specified
implicit dependencies? Like ueval.c will die if parameters.c
doesn't exist? But that should only matter at link, not during
object compile. Anyways, please let me know what's going on so I
can get on with the CMake translation.
parameters.scm is 'included' by eval.scm, etc.
Best Wishes,
Kon
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users