Re: [Chicken-users] find-files

[Zbigniew]

You're right about limit, of course.  I looked at using the
predicate---which isn't called for directories---and forgot limit,
which is.

On 2/1/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2/1/06, Zbigniew <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Just noticed that find-files traverses symbolic links to directories
> > (since directory? returns true for a directory symlink).  I'm not sure
> > this behaviour is desirable---at least there should be the option to
> > skip symlinks or treat them strictly as files.
>
> You can do that check in the predicate or in the limit procedure.
> Adding yet another optional argument makes `find-files' even clunkier
> than it already is... ;-)
>
>
> cheers,
> felix
>