Re: [Chicken-users] SRFIs 11, 12, and 15

[felix winkelmann]

On 12/31/05, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Chicken currently implements the SRFIs 11 (let-values and let-values*),
> 12 (exceptions), and 15 (fluid-let), but (use srfi-11), (use srfi-12),
> and (use srfi-15) and their syntactic analogues throw errors rather than
> silently doing nothing.

That's right. SRFI-11 is not supported completely, and 12 and 15 are withdrawn
SRFIs. Currently the policy is to treat withdrawn SRFIs as nonexistant,
and following from that, not to register feature-ID's for them. If you think
treating them like finalized SRFIs is a better idea, then I can change that,
of course.


cheers,
felix