[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?)
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?) |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:34:14 +0200 |
Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2005, 09:10 -0400 schrieb Graham Fawcett:
> I do believe in the general hardness of
> concurrency, and that threading often complicates a design
> unneccesarily (Ed's water + sodium analogy is well taken!).
> Personally, I'd lean toward any concurrency model that doesn't involve
> threads, not because of performance, but because of transparency and
> reduced complexity.
That's why I based Askemos eventually at pi-Calculus, atomic steps and
message exchange. At least we *have* *some* math for those. N(ot
matter how much we ignore it eventually.)
/Joerg
PS: To the rscheme dependancy of askemos code base: it's mostly R5RS and
the chicken port once did deliver pages. (The rscheme persistant store
used to be a bit unstable until version 0.7.3.30 or so. We recover from
a file system mirror based on plain/xml files. The chicken version ran
just out of that one.) But I admit that the current version will not
build with the chicken support any more. Help appreciated.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), felix winkelmann, 2005/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Ed Watkeys, 2005/10/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 2005/10/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 2005/10/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 2005/10/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Graham Fawcett, 2005/10/05
- Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?),
F. Wittenberger <=