[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] More idomatic code (Language Shootout)
From: |
Greg Buchholz |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] More idomatic code (Language Shootout) |
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Lately, in my quest to become more familiar with Scheme, I've been
toying with the programs over at the "Great Computer Language
Shootout"...
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
The "n-body" problem captured my interest, and I thought I'd try my hand
at crafting a more-modular/less-imperative program than the existing
Chicken solution...
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=chicken
...Well, I was quite impressed that my attempt...
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=nbody&lang=chicken&id=2
...turned out to be only about 2x slower than the original (let's ignore
the fact that it is 70x slower than C). The main changes I made were to
simplify the program by using vector math, and to try and replace "do"
loops and mutation with higher-order functions working on lists. I was
wondering if anyone would care to take a look at the code and see if
there were any easy things I was missing (being a Scheme novice and
all) to make the code cleaner, more idomatic, and/or faster.
Thanks,
Greg Buchholz
- [Chicken-users] More idomatic code (Language Shootout),
Greg Buchholz <=