Re: [Chicken-users] gcc 3.4.0

[Felix Winkelmann]

address@hidden wrote:

> On 23 Apr 2004, Felix Winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > So adding a C_regparm to the definition of runtime.c would be needed,
> > right?
>
>
> Yes. But there are many more places to be changed (even the C code that chicken 
> generates
> needs such changes). 

Yeah, obviously. I just wanted to be sure before changing all the places.


> So, maybe the easiest would be that you give the new gcc beast a try :-)

It seems I must... :-)


cheers,
felix