[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] chicken vs perl (was Re: help please)
From: |
Linh Dang |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] chicken vs perl (was Re: help please) |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:16:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
On 14 Apr 2004, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> I will also upload a new snapshot that has a faster read-line for
>> normal FILE* ports in the next days.
>
> Thanx, that would be cool to try!
>
>
> Any way, the current timings are:
>
> scheme program:
> 6.65s user 0.48s system 69% cpu
>
>
> perl script:
> 3.99s user 0.47s system 73% cpu
this is the timings for my script re-compiled with chicken 1.43:
4.91s user 0.26s system 77% cpu
It seems that chicken 1.43's optimization for read-line cut the system
time almost in half and cut 25% off the user time. Very very good.
Thanx felix
--
Linh Dang
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Linh Dang, 2004/04/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Alex Shinn, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Linh Dang, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Alex Shinn, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Felix Winkelmann, 2004/04/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Linh Dang, 2004/04/14
- [Chicken-users] chicken vs perl (was Re: help please),
Linh Dang <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Linh Dang, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, felix, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Bruce Hoult, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, Linh Dang, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] help please, felix, 2004/04/12