Re: [Chicken-users] extension of __declare(substitute, "..; ...") syntax?

[felix]

Daniel B. Faken wrote:
> Sorry; I should have pointed out that I didn't want case-insensitivity.
> For example, I'm leaving the GL constants all caps (and want to do this
> to help people distinguish btw functions and constants).
> E.g. (gl-matrix-mode gl-PROJECTION)
>
>   Also, I just thought people might be interested in more general 
> transformations via the "easy FFI".
>
> Daniel

Ah, I see. What would you prefer? How about a user-defined
transformation function, like:

__declare(transform, "<REGEX>;<SCHEME-CODE>")

The <SCHEME-CODE> could evaluate to a procedure that
will get the result of the match as arguments and returns
a new string. Would that be acceptable?


cheers,
felix