Re: [Chicken-users] string-index in extras and srfi-13

[felix]

felix wrote:
> > How could the ambiguity best be resolved? Rename the 'extras' version
> > of string-index to something else?
>
> That would be the best solution. Any ideas?

Hm, I'm not too happy with the situation. The duplication
of several string-routines in `extras' and `srfi-13' will
probably be a source of confusion forever.

Solutions:

a) Throw away all string-stuff in extras (excluding some
  procedures that don't interfere with srfi-13).
b) Choose different names. Not good.


Any suggestions would be appreciated. If noone objects
I will probably nuke everything in extras that collides
with the SRFI.


cheers,
felix