[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specifi
From: |
Valtteri Vuorikoski |
Subject: |
Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2021 02:02:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
"Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> writes:
>
> Valtteri Vuorikoski wrote:
>> The bad news is that the full backup job with some 140k files
>> fails using an invocation that worked previously (apparently because
>> zisofs was only applied to files from the local filesystem).
>> ...
>> find /Mail -type f -pending_data -exec set_filter --zisofs --
>
> So now /Mail comes from NFS ?
> How many files are in Mail ? Most of the 140k ?
Looks like total is closer to 130k after I had adjusted some
excludes. Mail is local and is about 50k. I'd say about 90% of the
remaining 80k comes from NFS mounted filesystems.
> Does it work with -xattr "on" ?
>
> Did you try whether it really works with -for_backup if you omit the
> setting of zisofs filters ?
> (You may use -dev "stdio:/dev/zero" instead of -dev "/dev/sr0".
> It's only of interest whether the warning message appears.)
-for_backup with zisofs disabled (dev set to /dev/zero) also fails:
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 8170s 0.2% fifo 0% buf 50%
libisofs: WARNING : Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ: 37130 <>
37063
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 44587s 0.9% fifo 0% buf 50% 76.9xD
[…]
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 5082760s 98.8% fifo 0% buf 50% 137.4xD
libisofs: FATAL : Image is most likely damaged. Calculated/written tree end
address mismatch.
libisofs: FATAL : Image is most likely damaged. Calculated/written image end
address mismatch.
libburn : FAILURE : Premature end of input encountered. Missing: 444416 bytes
With only "-xattr any" and zisofs disabled:
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 7141s 0.1% fifo 0% buf 50%
libisofs: WARNING : Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ: 32551 <>
32522
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 36974s 0.7% fifo 0% buf 50% 55.0xD
[…]
xorriso : UPDATE : Writing: 5130836s 99.8% fifo 0% buf 50% 514.6xD
libisofs: FATAL : Image is most likely damaged. Calculated/written tree end
address mismatch.
libisofs: FATAL : Image is most likely damaged. Calculated/written image end
address mismatch.
libburn : FAILURE : Premature end of input encountered. Missing: 366592 bytes
Invocation with "-xattr on" finishes successfully.
> How ist it structured, roughly ? (How many subdirectories with how many
> files ?)
> How long are the file names ?
There are about 50k local files and 80k files from NFS mounts in a total
of around 16k directories. File names should be mostly normal (mean ~26
characters, maximum is 82), full paths get pretty long (>130 characters
is common, maximum is 260).
-Valtteri
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/01
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Valtteri Vuorikoski, 2021/02/01
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/01
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances,
Valtteri Vuorikoski <=
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Valtteri Vuorikoski, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Valtteri Vuorikoski, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/02
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/03
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/04
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Valtteri Vuorikoski, 2021/02/05
- Re: "Calculated and written ECMA-119 tree end differ" under very specific circumstances, Thomas Schmitt, 2021/02/06