[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:43:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:18:10PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Florian Pelz wrote:
> > address@hidden ~ [env]$ grub-mkrescue -o output.iso minimal
> > --xorriso=./grub-mkrescue-sed.sh
> > grub-mkrescue: warning: Your xorriso doesn't support `--grub2-boot-info'.
> > Some features are disabled. Please use xorriso 1.2.9 or later..
> >
> > and yields no output.iso for me. Note that xorriso actually has
> > version 1.5.0.
>
> Does the script offer x-permission ?
> (Shame on me for not thinking of this in my download instructions.)
>
This was the error. It works after `chmod +x grub-mkrescue-sed.sh`.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:14:48PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> It would be interesting to learn about EFIs which fail without MBR
> signature.
> […]
> - Put the resulting output.iso on USB stick and offer it to your firmware
> at boot time.
> Is it not found by the EFI boot manager ?
> If you let it boot, does the machine not show a GRUB prompt in the end ?
>
It shows up twice in the boot selection screen as “GRUB 2.02” and “EFI
Boot” just like the Guix USB drive before. It is bootable and shows a
GRUB prompt on my Macbook.
> - Negative results with other mode settings in MKRESCUE_SED_MODE would be
> interesting, too.
>
I can try tomorrow.
By the way, someone I know has a most peculiar machine called Lenovo
Ideapad 100S which does not boot Guix, but apparently is very picky in
general (cf. <https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=216476>).
Its CPU is claimed to support 64-bit, but its boot firmware rejects
most 64-bit isos. I wonder if we could get that machine to boot Guix
(at least it currently cannot boot
guixsd-install-0.15.0.i686-linux.iso), but that may well be a waste of
time. It might just not be feasible to please every EFI system.
> I wrote:
> > > So programs like /sbin/isosize can tell the image size even when the
> > > ISO has already been copied to USB stick.
>
> > Sounds like this could be used to get a checksum or maybe GPG
> > verification of a USB drive that supposedly contains the iso.
>
> That's what this property is advised for in Debian's CD FAQ.
> One can read trailing garbage not only from USB sticks but also from
> most DVD types.
> (The layout with nested partitions obsoletes the cleanliness
> considerations about partition start at LBA 0.)
>
So… GPT is wrong for some optical media too?
Regards,
Florian
Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/23
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/23
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/23
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <=
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/24
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/24
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/24
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/25
- Re: [Bug-xorriso] ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/04/25