[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name
From: |
Tim Ruehsen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:37:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-2-amd64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Tuesday 05 June 2012 schrieb Hrvoje Niksic:
> I'd like to suggest that the new --bit option be named --bps instead.
> The use case for this option is reporting of download speed in [gmk]bps,
> not expressing all quantities in bits. Besides, the word "bit" has
> other meanings (small piece), while "bps" is quite recognizable to the
> target audience for the option.
I would like to see --report-bps. It explains itself, well, at least better
than --bps which could be anything.
To regard the current question of Fernando Cassia <address@hidden> (bug-
wget 5.6.2012) (Is there any way to make wget report download speed in Kbps
not MBps at the end of the transfer?):
--report-bps replaces --bit
--report-[gmkn]bps would respect the user's demand for explicitly gbps, mbps
and kbps, with nbps = plain bps without giga, mega or kilo.
What do you think ?
Regards, Tim
- [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Hrvoje Niksic, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name,
Tim Ruehsen <=
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Ángel González, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Hrvoje Niksic, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Tim Ruehsen, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Hrvoje Niksic, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Tim Ruehsen, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Tim Ruehsen, 2012/06/07
- Re: [Bug-wget] --bit option name, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2012/06/07