[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: sort broken?
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: sort broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:03:22 -0600 |
> | Shouldn't items 10-14 come after item 9 in one of the examples below? Or
> am
> | I doing something wrong?
> | address@hidden mbillens]$ sort -n -k 13,17 s.txt
> | 0 thread B[ 14]
> | 0 thread B[ 2]
Your report matches a common pattern. Jim has previously answered
these reports with the following mail. Note that some vendors set
those language variables for you without you being aware of them.
Bob
========================================================================
Jim Meyering writes:
Thanks for the report.
Here's the canned reply:
------------
You are using the version of sort that comes with textutils-2.0
or newer and have reported a problem whereby it is sorting in
some non-ASCII order.
That is due not to a bug in sort, but to the fact that you have
set environment variables that direct sort to use improper locale-
specific tables (you or your vendor have probably set environment
variables like LANG, LC_ALL, or LANGUAGE to en_US).
Unset them, and then set LC_ALL to POSIX
# If you use bash or some other Bourne-based shell,
export LC_ALL=POSIX
# If you use a C-shell,
setenv LC_ALL POSIX
and sort will then work the way you expect.
-----------
BTW, in recent textutils test releases, sort --help output
includes this:
*** WARNING ***
This version of sort honors the locale settings in your environment.
For example, if you set one of the LANG or LC_ALL environment variables
to `en_US', then sort will work very differently than most people expect.
If that's not what you want, then set LC_ALL to POSIX in your environment.
- Fw: sort broken?, Matt Billenstein, 2001/04/18
- Re: Fw: sort broken?,
Bob Proulx <=