Re: Problem compiling

[Kevin Ryde]

address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:
>
>     !   char str[2] = { c, 0 };
>
> What is wrong with this?  Why does the initialization have to have a
> constant value?  I could declare int x = c, so why not able to use a
> variable as an array element initializer?

I think non-constant initializers in aggregates might be a c99-ism
(also supported by gcc prior to that).  See the "Initializers" node in
the gcc docs.