Re: standards for info install

[Karl Berry]

    I find listing an absolute installed file as target name a bit
    weird 

Me too.  I think it was written (by rms?) more to show the steps
involved than as something that should be copied.  I don't recall ever
seeing a package that used this rule literally.

Perhaps I'll add a few more words of warning, or something.  Or maybe we
should change the target to a pseudo-name like "install-info" and excise
the address@hidden  Yeah, I think we should.  Unless rms vetoes that.

    Comment atop of the example stating that changes are to be
    communicated to bug-make.
    ...
    @comment This example has been carefully formatted for the Make manual.
    @comment Please do not reformat it without talking to address@hidden

Whatever happens, I'll try to keep the lines to their current lengths :).

Thanks,
K