[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kernel stuff
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: kernel stuff |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:03:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Daniel Kjeserud wrote:
> address@hidden kjes]$ uname --help
Thanks for the report. But 'uname --version' would have been best.
> Report bugs to <address@hidden>.
> address@hidden kjes]$ uname -v
> #1 Fri Jan 31 06:51:30 EST 2003
> address@hidden kjes]$ uname -r
> 2.4.18-24.8.0
>
> ----------------
> Do you see the problem?
No I do not see the problem in the above output.
> Just a simple write fault.
> Just wanted to bring it to your attention.
Everything looks fine to me. Perhaps a cut-n-paste missed posting the
problem?
Here is the output from my machine.
uname --version
uname (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
uname -v
#1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002
uname -r
2.4.18-k7
Really, though, the only portable output to count on from the uname
command is uname with no options. That prints the system name. All
else is os dependent. I recommend avoiding it. (However, uname -a is
useful for reporting bugs to tell us what system you are using all in
one pass.)
Bob
- kernel stuff, Daniel Kjeserud, 2003/03/03
- Re: kernel stuff,
Bob Proulx <=