[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date error?
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: date error? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:28:31 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Please keep responses on the mailing list and not to me privately
unless it is personal.
Bob
Meister, Stefan <address@hidden> [2002-11-04 07:53:59 +0100]:
> Hello Bob,
>
> here is the Version of date:
>
> address@hidden:~ > date --version
> date (GNU sh-utils) 2.0
> Written by David MacKenzie.
>
> Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> address@hidden:~ > rpm -qa | grep utils
> sh_utils-2.0-199
>
> I am uing a SuSE Linux Enterprise Server Distribution for zSeries. I told
> SuSE about this bug.
>
> mit freundlichen Gr??en / kind regards
>
> Stefan Meister
> K-DOI-11
>
> Volkswagen AG
> Brieffach 1883/0
> 38436 Wolfsburg
>
> Tel.: +49 (5361)9-43507
> Fax.: +49 (5361)9-29289
> mailto:address@hidden
>
> > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: address@hidden [SMTP:address@hidden
> > Gesendet am: Samstag, 2. November 2002 02:58
> > An: Meister, Stefan
> > Cc: 'address@hidden'
> > Betreff: Re: date error?
> >
> > > is it a bug or a feature?:
> > >
> > > address@hidden:~ > date +%D
> > > 10/31/02
> > > address@hidden:~ > date +%m --date='last month'
> > > 10
> >
> > You did not say which version of date you are using.
> >
> > date --version
> >
> > If you are using date version 2.0 or earlier that is certainly
> > possible. A large number of bug fixes and improvements went into the
> > sh-utils-2.0.11 around October 2000. Please install a newer version
> > of the code. If using a vendor version then your vendor probably has
> > updated this code. If you are compiling your own then The test
> > release versions at ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/fetish are best.
> >
> > Bob