bug-readline
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
From
:
林宏雄
Subject
:
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
Date
:
Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:39:54 +0900
Hi,
> Doesn't it make sense for these other language bindings to include the
> constants or their equivalents? (I know, I know, tilting at windmills
> and all that.)
FYI, The Perl binding defines the constants.
https://metacpan.org/pod/Term::ReadLine::Gnu#EXPORTS
--
Hiroo Hayashi
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
Explicitly document \001 and \002?
,
Mingye Wang
,
2021/04/16
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
,
Chet Ramey
,
2021/04/16
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
,
林宏雄
<=
Prev by Date:
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
Next by Date:
Documentation update about Cygwin and MinGW
Previous by thread:
Re: Explicitly document \001 and \002?
Next by thread:
Documentation update about Cygwin and MinGW
Index(es):
Date
Thread