[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION test needs <stdlib.h>

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION test needs <stdlib.h> for C99 compilers
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:56:57 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

On 9/6/19 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Chet Ramey:
>> On 9/6/19 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Chet Ramey:
>>>> On 9/6/19 6:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> Otherwise, the test always fails on C99 compilers which do not support
>>>>> implicit function declarations.
>>>> Thanks for the report. This was fixed in the bash and readline devel
>>>> branches about month ago.
>>> Thanks.  Are these branches public?  People have copied this file, and I
>>> want to point them to the upstream source so that they can fix their
>>> copies.
>> Sure. They're on savannah.gnu.org, right next to the master branches.
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/log/?h=devel
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/readline.git/log/?h=devel
> Sorry, I don't see the fix here:
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/readline.git/tree/examples/autoconf/RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION?h=devel#n36>
> I see it in the copy here:
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/tree/aclocal.m4?h=devel#n1854>

It's also in the readline branch's aclocal.m4.

> But it would be nice to have it in the smaller separate file as well.


``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    address@hidden    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]