[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION test needs <stdlib.h>
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-readline] [PATCH] RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION test needs <stdlib.h> for C99 compilers |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:56:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 9/6/19 10:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Chet Ramey:
>
>> On 9/6/19 10:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * Chet Ramey:
>>>
>>>> On 9/6/19 6:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> Otherwise, the test always fails on C99 compilers which do not support
>>>>> implicit function declarations.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the report. This was fixed in the bash and readline devel
>>>> branches about month ago.
>>>
>>> Thanks. Are these branches public? People have copied this file, and I
>>> want to point them to the upstream source so that they can fix their
>>> copies.
>>
>> Sure. They're on savannah.gnu.org, right next to the master branches.
>>
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/log/?h=devel
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/readline.git/log/?h=devel
>
> Sorry, I don't see the fix here:
>
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/readline.git/tree/examples/autoconf/RL_LIB_READLINE_VERSION?h=devel#n36>
>
> I see it in the copy here:
>
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bash.git/tree/aclocal.m4?h=devel#n1854>
It's also in the readline branch's aclocal.m4.
> But it would be nice to have it in the smaller separate file as well.
OK.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU address@hidden http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/